Former GOP operative Scott Leiendecker just bought Dominion Voting Systems, giving him ownership of voting systems used in 27 states. The news last week that Dominion Voting Systems was purchased by the founder and CEO of Knowink, a Missouri-based maker of electronic poll books, has left election integrity activists confused over what, if anything, this could mean for voters and the integrity of US elections. The company, acquired by Scott Leiendecker, a former Republican Party operative and election director in Missouri before founding Knowink, said in a press release that he was rebranding Dominion, which has headquarters in Canada and the United States, under the name Liberty Vote "in a bold and historic move to transform and improve election integrity in America" and to distance the company from false allegations made previously by President Donald Trump and his supporters that the company had rigged the 2020 presidential election to give the win to President Joe Biden. The Liberty release said that the rebranded company will be 100 percent American owned, that it will have a "paper ballot focus" that leverages hand-marked paper ballots, will "prioritize facilitating third-party auditing," and is "committed to domestic staffing and software development." The press release provided no details, however, to explain what this means in practice.

Artificial intelligence had its break out year in 2023. We chose those two language models because they use live information from the internet to make their predictions, unlike ChatGPT and Microsoft's Bing which rely on older data. AGI is a theoretical intelligent agent able to complete any intellectual task a human can - and the arrival of AGI is forecast to cause huge changes to human society. Backed by Google and Amazon, Claude's parent company Anthropic was founded by former members of OpenAI, makers of ChatGPT. 'In recent years we've seen AI algorithms match or exceed human performance in specialized tasks like object recognition, game playing, and language processing.

Question-and-answer formats provide a novel experimental platform for investigating cybersecurity questions. Unlike previous chatbots, the latest ChatGPT model from OpenAI supports an advanced understanding of complex coding questions. The research demonstrates thirteen coding tasks that generally qualify as stages in the MITRE ATT&CK framework, ranging from credential access to defense evasion. With varying success, the experimental prompts generate examples of keyloggers, logic bombs, obfuscated worms, and payment-fulfilled ransomware. The empirical results illustrate cases that support the broad gain of functionality, including self-replication and self-modification, evasion, and strategic understanding of complex cybersecurity goals. One surprising feature of ChatGPT as a language-only model centers on its ability to spawn coding approaches that yield images that obfuscate or embed executable programming steps or links.

A group of hackers at last year's DefCon computer security conference in Las Vegas attempt to (legally) break in to a touch screen voting machine. The effort was part of a weekend-long Voting Machine Hacking Village at the conference aimed at raising awareness about vulnerabilities to the U.S. election system. The safety of our election systems didn't exactly earn a vote of confidence following this weekend's DefCon hacking conference in Las Vegas. One session reportedly featured an 11-year-old who successfully hacked into a replica website for the Florida Secretary of State and changed election results. It took the young hacker only 10 minutes to break in and gain access. The child took part in a DefCon Voting Machine Hacking Village, PBS reports, where kids as young as eight years old attempted to access replica web pages and change information.

The cybersecurity industry has always had a fortress mentality: Firewall the perimeter! But that mindset has failed--miserably, as each new headline-generating hack reminds us. Even if you do patch all your software, the way Equifax didn't, or you randomize all your passwords, the way most of us don't, bad actors are going to get past your heavily guarded gate, into your network. And once they do, they're free to go wild. Scott Rosenberg is an editor at Backchannel.

The cybersecurity industry has always had a fortress mentality: Firewall the perimeter! But that mindset has failed--miserably, as each new headline-generating hack reminds us. Even if you do patch all your software, the way Equifax didn't, or you randomize all your passwords, the way most of us don't, bad actors are going to get past your heavily guarded gate, into your network. And once they do, they're free to go wild. Scott Rosenberg is an editor at Backchannel.

Reports this week of Russian intrusions into U.S. election systems have startled many voters, but computer experts are not surprised. They have long warned that Americans vote in a way that's so insecure that hackers could change the outcome of races at the local, state and even national level. Multibillion-dollar investments in better election technology after the troubled 2000 presidential election count prompted widespread abandonment of flawed paper-based systems, such as punch ballots. But the rush to embrace electronic voting technology -- and leave old-fashioned paper tallies behind -- created new sets of vulnerabilities that have taken years to fix. "There are computers used in all points of the election process, and they can all be hacked," said Princeton computer scientist Andrew Appel, an expert in voting technologies.